Skip to Main Content
The Conductor (
antitrust
) wrote
2015-11-11 03:04 am (UTC)
no subject
He did not.
The sequence of events that you posited during the trial was actually entirely correct, as was Vivacious' assertion that Relentless disguised the more distinctive injury by covering it with a larger one that he could claim he obtained elsewhere.
(
494 comments
)
Post a comment in response:
From:
Anonymous
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID
(will be screened)
Identity URL:
Log in?
Dreamwidth account
(will be screened)
Account name
Password
Log in?
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
.
Subject
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Formatting type
Casual HTML
Markdown
Raw HTML
Rich Text Editor
Message
Log in
Account name:
Password:
Remember me
Other options:
Forget your password?
Log in with OpenID?
Close
menu
Log in
Create
Create Account
Display Preferences
Explore
Interests
Directory Search
Site and Journal Search
Latest Things
Random Journal
Random Community
FAQ
Shop
Buy Dreamwidth Services
Gift a Random User
DW Merchandise
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
no subject
The sequence of events that you posited during the trial was actually entirely correct, as was Vivacious' assertion that Relentless disguised the more distinctive injury by covering it with a larger one that he could claim he obtained elsewhere.